IDEA TO PONDER # 2

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody 

ought not to be trusted by anybody.” 
Thomas Paine

PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

A TRUTH?

TOWN HALL LAST SUPPER

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody 

ought not to be trusted by anybody.” 
Thomas Paine

PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

LCC'S LAST SUPPER AT TOWN HALL

Well Monday Oct 27 and the mystery is who will be at the table feasting on the hapless ratepayer's largess at this LAST SUPPER. The meeting's agenda is loaded with potentials for last ditch payoffs that one day will come to light. THEY ALWAYS DO! Some of these last minute 'decisions' could even bite us Launcestonians on the bum. THEY OFTEN DO! The question that really needs to be asked is, why do these decisions need to be made at 5mins to midnight? They do not! WHY? Because those round the table will not be around, necessarily, to be ACCOUNTABLE. Some are going willingly, and others, well the ratepayers and residents might decide very soon to see them off. And as for the GM, well he is in the lap of the GODS. We can always wait for the minutes but they may not tell us much. THEY OFTEN DO NOT! AND the Examiner's reporter is on hols so not much hope there. THERE RARELY IS! Let's look forward to the new Council in the hope that it'll be ACCOUNTABLE in ways that we wish to become accustomed to!

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody 

ought not to be trusted by anybody.” 
Thomas Paine

PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW

Click here to read the ratepayer's contributions

Click here to read about HPS(Tas) Inc.

“A body of men holding themselves accountable to nobody 

ought not to be trusted by anybody.” 
Thomas Paine

PLEASE LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW AN ENTRY

COUNCILS: Placemakers OR Business

PLACEMAKING = [1] • [2] • [3] • [4] • [5]  Click on a number

BUSINESS = [1] • [2] • [3] • [4] • [5]  Click on a number 

UPG: Unconditional Positive Regard & Rankism

In medical situations, particularly in the area of mental health, ‘cares’ are required to have, need to have, productive and healing relationships with their patients /clients/ charges. This was once left to intuition and as something a ‘good care’ would innately know about and put into practice largely as an outcome of experience. Largely it is still the case.

Carers cannot ”love” their charges albeit that in some caring relationships it might be said that they do in a kind of way. Not romantic, erotic or spiritual love but something else.

What else? Increasingly ‘caring practices’ while regarding such emotional attachments between the cared-for and the carer as inappropriate/ unprofessional/ improper/ unhealthy, there was still a need to ‘theorise’ the ‘ideal relationship’ in a contemporary and professional context.

Thus “UnconditionalPositive Regard” (UPR), was the term that had some resonance, and that won some currency, in the increasingly intellectualised world of mental healthcare and other branches of healthcare.

The humanistic psychologist Carl Rogers is said to have coined the term to describe the basic acceptance and support of a person regardless of what the person says or does. Supposed a less complex and more easily applied concept than ”love” with all the baggage that idea carries.

By extension, UPR might well have some currency in regard to the world’s of governance and management.  It’d be not only unrealistic but also totality inappropriate to require politician to love their constituents. Nonetheless, in an ideal world both politician and constituent might well be expected to hold each other in ‘high regard’ and quite possibly in UPR.

Arguably when we vote, what we’re aiming to do is divine this UPR kind of relationship and vote accordingly. Largely it’s probably done intuitively and subconsciously. When we vote it might be useful, when looking for ‘accountability’, to look for the UPR factor, or its potential at least, when ranking the candidates.

In local government, a Council that had collective and mutual UPR for the constituency and visa versa would be utopian. It might be unlikely but it is worth shooting for!

And then there is “RANKISM”.  The author and citizen diplomat Robert W. Fuller says “rankism is an assertion of superiority. It typically takes the form of putting others down. It's what "Somebodies" do to "nobodies." Or, more precisely, it is what people who think they're Somebodies do to people they take for nobodies… It turns out that rankism is the source of most man-made suffering.“

The prospect of governance unblighted by rankism and in a community where there is mutual UPR between governance and constituents is perhaps too utopian to count on but it is worth aspiring towards.

MONEY MATTERS

Anecdotally, gaining access to 'Launceston's Accounts' has been described as all too difficult. There may be reasons for this but one cannot ever be that it is inappropriate. Surely, asking for such information may place an extra load on the accounting team. However,in the days of computer records most large corporations can supply same day analysis of money matters for operational managers.

Launceston is a $100 million operation and it would be cost effective to be able match performance levels in the private sector. Furthermore, Aldermen armed with clear up to date financial reporting they would be better placed to develop more appropriate, and issue sensitive, policies.

At LCC over recent years its often claimed that the distinctions between government and management have been blurred. Civic administration 101 tells us that the dividing lines are is clear:

• Governance determines the policies and priorities to do with what, why where & when; and
• Management is charged with the task of implementation, the  how & the who.

Below are two sets of figures that are not routinely accessible to governance for what anecdotally appears to be a myriad of reasons. Given that Council is managing ratepayer's money to provide ratepayer services there is a case for ratepayers/ constituents / the financiers to have ready access to Council financial reporting in order to facilitate a more productive, more inclusive, discourse between Council (the service providers) and the constituency ( the serviced). It should lead to effective governance.

Increasingly social media in concert with the evolving information technologies will better enable fast access to real time records. With current technologies that bis almost the case or maybe that point has actually been arrived at.

CLICK ABOVE TO ENLARGE

CLICK ABOVE TO ENLARGE

IDEA # 3

CLICK HERE TO GO TO SOURCE

IDEA # 1.001

CLICK HERE FOR MORE INFORMATION

Should politicians be held financially responsible for promoting false statements?

CLICK HERE TO GO TO SOURCE
CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE

NOT A BAD IDEA REALLY

CLICK HERE TO FESSup

IDEA # 1

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE

IDEA # 2

IDEAS TO PONDER #1

Link to source

WATCH THIS SPACE

This site is intended as one where the issue of accountability in a local context can be explored and tested. Accountability is a contentious and emotive idea and one that is often laced with innuendo. It's an idea, a big idea, that very often occupies tender ground where its meanings and substance comes under unwelcome scrutiny. Nonetheless, whenever it is achieved, and to the satisfaction of those contesting an issue, the outcome is generally one of healed rifts plus better and more inclusive understandings.

CLICK ON THE IMAGE TO ENLARGE